Skip to content

← All work

Insurance

Sharper claim forecasts, half the idle reserve.

A claim-level cost forecasting pipeline and a portfolio simulation that showed how much reserve capital was tied up for no reason.

Engagement
Client project
Client
Insurance claims-technology company
Capabilities
Forecasting · Risk modelling · Simulation · Data engineering
error in claim-level cost forecasts
−69%
of over-committed reserve capital freed
49%

See it work

reserve-simulation

interactive demo · synthetic portfolio

Total portfolio cost · simulated outcomes

0 / 10,000

model reservecurrent reserve€90M€100M€110M€120M€130M€140M

outcomes above the reserve: 0.5% of simulations

Confidence level
Current reserve
€140.0M
Model reserve
…
Expected cost
€100.0M

Over-committed capital freed

—

simulating…

The problem

Every open insurance claim needs a cost estimate, and the sum of those estimates decides how much capital has to be held in reserve. Estimates were rough, so reserves were set conservatively, and a lot of capital sat idle, covering uncertainty rather than real risk.

Our approach

  • A two-stage forecasting model first predicts whether and how a claim will escalate, then predicts its cost, which handles the many small claims and the rare expensive ones far better than a single model.
  • A Monte Carlo reserve simulation combined claim-level forecasts and their uncertainty into a distribution of total portfolio cost, so the reserve could be set at an explicit confidence level instead of a rule of thumb.
  • Clear outputs for finance teams: the distribution, the chosen confidence level and the capital it implies, side by side with the current reserve.

The result

Claim-level cost-forecast error fell by 69%. The portfolio simulation showed that 49% of the over-committed reserve capital could be released while still covering the same level of risk.

Client details are anonymised. Demos are illustrative, built on synthetic data and fictional brands.

Next case study

AI-powered audit & fraud analysis

■ Free 30-minute call

Have a problem worth solving?

Tell us what happens today. In 30 minutes you’ll know whether AI can make it meaningfully better, roughly what it would take, and what it could be worth.