Insurance
Sharper claim forecasts, half the idle reserve.
A claim-level cost forecasting pipeline and a portfolio simulation that showed how much reserve capital was tied up for no reason.
- Engagement
- Client project
- Client
- Insurance claims-technology company
- Capabilities
- Forecasting · Risk modelling · Simulation · Data engineering
- error in claim-level cost forecasts
- −69%
- of over-committed reserve capital freed
- 49%
See it work
reserve-simulation
interactive demo · synthetic portfolio
Total portfolio cost · simulated outcomes
0 / 10,000
outcomes above the reserve: 0.5% of simulations
- Current reserve
- €140.0M
- Model reserve
- …
- Expected cost
- €100.0M
Over-committed capital freed
—
simulating…
The problem
Every open insurance claim needs a cost estimate, and the sum of those estimates decides how much capital has to be held in reserve. Estimates were rough, so reserves were set conservatively, and a lot of capital sat idle, covering uncertainty rather than real risk.
Our approach
- A two-stage forecasting model first predicts whether and how a claim will escalate, then predicts its cost, which handles the many small claims and the rare expensive ones far better than a single model.
- A Monte Carlo reserve simulation combined claim-level forecasts and their uncertainty into a distribution of total portfolio cost, so the reserve could be set at an explicit confidence level instead of a rule of thumb.
- Clear outputs for finance teams: the distribution, the chosen confidence level and the capital it implies, side by side with the current reserve.
The result
Claim-level cost-forecast error fell by 69%. The portfolio simulation showed that 49% of the over-committed reserve capital could be released while still covering the same level of risk.
Client details are anonymised. Demos are illustrative, built on synthetic data and fictional brands.